
In theory, WWE has a good thing going with their two top title-holders. Between Sheamus, the affable, larger-than-life brawler who holds the World Heavyweight Championship, and CM Punk, the slick, self-aggrandizing, oppportunistic WWE champion, they should have all their bases covered for any kind of story they want to tell. But there’s a problem.
From a storytelling standpoint, their characters just don’t work. Or at least, they don’t work in the way WWE wants them to.

Sheamus in particular is broken almost beyond repair, and a lot of it comes down to the WWE being a victim of its own success. When wrestling hit the peak of the Attitude Era in the late ’90s — a time when ratings were at an all-time high and people were actually willing to rock Austin 3:16 and nWo shirts in public — the success was largely on the shoulders of guys like Stone Cold Steve Austin and the Rock. These were characters whose appeal went beyond the traditional roles of hero and villain to something with a little more edge to it, and their popularity was rooted in a reaction to the idea of over-the-top characters that had been the dominant creative force in WWF for years as it was in their personal charisma.
It certainly wasn’t a new idea then. People loved Ric Flair for years because of the personality that he brought to his character, but even he was ostensibly presented as a bad guy. Austin and the Rock weren’t. Even when the Rock would run down the audience, he did it with a style that people loved. Austin’s struggle to the top of the card and the frustration that fueled his badass, don’t-trust-anybody persona made him relatable to the viewer, even when he was attacking a man who’d been laid up in a hospital and clocking him in the head with a bedpan. Of course, it didn’t hurt up that the clockee was Vince McMahon, or that the resulting sound effect was the funniest thing this side of a Bugs Bunny cartoon, and in fact, those were a pretty big part of it. He was always given opponents that were somehow bigger and more powerful than he was, which is what made Vince McMahon, his actual boss, the perfect foil. No matter what Austin did, McMahon always had the power.
Those characters worked. They worked so well, in fact, that WWE is still doing a brisk business in selling Austin 3:16 shirts even though he hasn’t been on the roster for years. So it makes sense that they’d try to catch lightning in a bottle again with Sheamus. But for all their trying, they just can’t do it. Instead, they’ve been shooting for lovable, renegade hooligan and ended up at complete fucking asshole.
Don’t get me wrong: For a guy whose character I can’t stand, I actually like Sheamus a lot. I met him a few months ago and he couldn’t have been nicer, and while it might not be a popular opinion, I think he’s enjoyable to watch in the ring. Even if he’s not always (or ever) all that great at selling, he’s got a great look and he goes like a freight train. Even his increasing arsenal of unnecessary finishing moves — the latest of which is a Texas Cloverleaf, because, you know, clovers and Ireland and all that — is at least a sign that he’s learning and expanding what he does in the ring. He’s evolving instead of staying stale, and that’s one of the most important things a wrestler can do. Those are all reasons why I want to like Sheamus.
But those aren’t the reasons WWE’s giving me. Instead, they want me to like him because he’s fighting Alberto Del Rio, who in turn I’m told is a villain simply because he’s a “Mexican Aristocrat,” a pretty amazing example of the kind of race- and class-baiting that I honestly would’ve thought WWE would move past once we got a full decade into the 21st Century.
For his part, Del Rio is doing a great job as the classic arrogant heel, calling the fans “peasants” and driving to the ring in the ostentatious luxury cars of a true One Percenter. Beyond that, though, his transgressions against Sheamus have been pretty much confined to actual wrestling. As near as I can tell, Del Rio hasn’t run him over, or blown up his car, or dug up a relative’s corpse and dragged it around a cemetery on a chain while shouting insults about his parentage — all truly amazing heel tactics of the past — he’s just put him in a submission hold and held it after the bell.
And the longer their feud goes on, the more disproportionate Sheamus’s responses get. He constantly takes things beyond wrestling, gleefully destroying Del Rio’s car or giving Ricardo Rodriguez, Del Rio’s personal ring announcer/lackey/manservant (and, as far as WWE viewers are concerned, helpless non-wrestler), his “devastating” Brogue Kick right in the head. Which, it’s worth noting, happened when Rodriguez made the pretty unambiguously heroic act of throwing himself in front of Del Rio to take the kick for him, instead.
Even the matches themselves don’t play out in a way that supports Sheamus as the hero. Rather than the tough-as-nails scrapper that they keep telling us he is, Sheamus wins through opportunism and cheating. The SummerSlam match was a perfect example. Sheamus finds himself with the opportunity to clock Del Rio upside the head with a boot and takes it, then knocks Del Rio’s feet off the ropes for good measure to secure his win, all while the fans are told that he’s a stand-up fella.
Then comes their next match, which was set up with the Brogue Kick being banned after Sheamus happily booted Rodriguez into a neck brace. Rather than giving Sheamus an obstacle to overcome, something, anything to make him seem like an underdog, or that would give him a reason to be adding all those other finishing holds to his repertoire on Smackdown, the ban is simply overturned at the last minute.
And to make matters worse, the ban was set up in what was quite possibly the worst possible way. In what felt like a clear effort to recapture the surprising fun of the “Kane and Daniel Bryan at Anger Management Class” vignettes, we’re shown video of a “legal deposition” in which Sheamus sits around casually sticking it to the man by dropping jokes about being Jewish and mocking Ricardo’s accent in a bit that that may not have been actually racist, but definitely felt racist-adjacent. Just a thought, but when you give a guy a nickname as loaded as “The Great White,” an explicit reference to his skin color that recalls the backlash against black boxers a hell of a lot more than it conjures up images of sharks, and then have him enter the arena underneath a screen flashing shots of a glowing white cross, maybe racial humor isn’t the way to go. It ended up being the most uncomfortable thing WWE’s done on purpose in years.
And it’s especially frustrating because Sheamus stars in WWE’s anti-bullying campaign PSAs. I realize that he’s a guy playing a character, but the whiplash-inducing switch between his sincerity at being picked on as a kid and the gigantic heavyweight going for cheers by literally attacking smaller, weaker people is just maddening. The end result is that a guy I actively want to like has been made into my least favorite part of the show every week without fail.
With CM Punk, it’s the opposite problem: He works too well.

This, of course, is a far less frustrating problem than the one Sheamus has, but it’s still interesting to watch WWE doing everything they can to try to portray Punk as a villain while the crowd remains firmly in his corner. It really comes down to the fact that Punk is very much the heir to Austin’s legacy.
Even though he’s been working for WWE since 2006 (and longer if you count his time in development at OVW), Punk still thrives on that image of being a guy who came up from the indies. He has the image of an outsider, and it’s one that he’s able to play up, with character motivations that are based on a core of truth. His current feud with John Cena, for instance, is based around the idea that even when he’s WWE Champion, Punk still can’t wrench the spotlight away from Cena, the man that he originally beat for the title, where WWE has firmly planted it.
And the thing is, we as the audience know this is true, because we see it happening every week. We see WrestleMania where the WWE Championship is a prelude to Cena’s match against the star of GI Joe: The Rise of Cobra (and where the World Heavyweight Championship is settled in an 18-second comedy match at the top of the show). We’ve seen that even when he wrestles Cena — with another wrestler thrown in for good measure — he still get pushed up the card so that the main event can be Vince McMahon’s son-in-law against a guy who quit wrestling ten years ago to play football and from what I can tell wound up as a spokesman for a sandwich restaurant.
Because we see that stuff happening every week on the show, he doesn’t seem like a raging egomaniac. He seems like a guy who’s frustrated that he’s worked his ass off to get to the top of his field and consistently has his accomplishments ignored in favor of someone who stays in the top slot regardless of how he performs. And because that frustration comes out in the form of Punk aggressively referring to himself as a wrestler, rather than the official company line of a Sports Entertainment Variety Show Superstar, it’s impossible for a wrestling fan who wants to watch a wrestling show to not get behind him.
He only got more likable when his stated motivation became a demand for the people around him to admit that he was the best in the world, because by the simple logic that WWE has set up for the past 60 years, he is. He’s the WWE Champion and has been for almost a year, and by definition, that makes him the best. By the WWE’s own rules, the core foundation that their entire company and its ongoing story is based around, that is literally what that belt means. The refusal of other people to admit that — particularly Cena, whose character is built on loyalty to the company and respect for what it stands for — doesn’t make them seem like they’re standing up to Punk’s bullying. It makes them seem like they’re going out of their way to be dicks to him.
They’re constantly belittling his accomplishment, so it’s no wonder that he’d finally resort to fighting them about it. He’s the one guy in the company who actually acts like he actually gives a damn about the title.
Because Punk’s motivations make so much sense, and because they’re backed up by great in-ring work loaded with tributes to beloved wrestlers like Randy Savage and clean victories over his opponents in eleven months as a fighting champion, it’s almost impossible to turn the crowd against him. It’s been genuinely hilarious to see the lengths they’ve been going to in order to get even the slightest reaction against him, and every time Punk’s actions make perfect sense.
Yes, he walked out instead of wrestling a match in front of is hometown crowd of Chicago. It was a match against Sheamus arranged by AJ, a vindictive would-be lover who Punk rejected out of concern for her own mental state, in which there was nothing for Punk to gain. I wouldn’t have bothered with it either. They even went so far as to have him insult Bret Hart in Montreal while John Cena was cutting a promo in French, and even that didn’t work. Hell, they had him wrestle in New York Yankees pinstripes at a show in Boston. The crowd is still behind that guy. And it makes sense that they would be — WWE themselves are pretty firmly behind them at this point, with a DVD set, a video game, and a line of t-shirts they can’t keep in stock all based on how much we like him.
So that’s where they’re at: One guy that’s impossible to love, and one that’s impossible to hate, no matter how hard they try to make us do the opposite.
Chris Sims loves Batman. That’s pretty much all you need to know. He is a Senior Writer at Comics Alliance and blogs at http://www.the-isb.com.
[photos via WWE.com]


Makes sense.
…makes a lot of sense.
….makes the most sense ever possible in the history of forever.
This is a general opinion I’ve seen from Brandon and others, and it seems really sound when you say it. But I wonder, do you think the above reasons are really why the masses are reacting the way they do? Because all those reasons seem like they may be a little well-formed for the average fan’s brain, to be honest.
Those tributes to Randy Savage are pretty much ass 99% of the time. Maybe he could get booed that way? Just do really shitty versions of popular former guys’ moves. An awful Sharpshooter would be a Rock tribute, though, so he’d have to do it even worse than Dwayne.
There’s no way that’s possible.
I haven’t played the WWE videogames in years, but I remember a surefire way to make the crowd boo you was to do the same move over and over and over.
Punk should just start doing nothing in his matches but kicks to the hamstring and Go to Sleeps.
Lester – Irish whip to corner, running knee. Whip to opposite corner, running knee. Whip, knee, whip, knee for about six minutes straight.
Do the same move over and over to get boos?
Rule does not apply to Ezekiel Jackson, BODY SLAMZ!
Lester, if Brandon’s theory is correct, the audience would love for Punk to walk in, GTS someone a bunch of times, then leave.
No, that there’s what you call domination (it’s the combination of skill and concentration).
Lobster – now you’re talking! I’d say he could throw in a repeated taunt but he already does that with the title belt now.
Lobster – I’d actually pay to see the whip/knee thing. Might be hilarious.
I still manage to strongly dislike Punk. And I manage to like Sheamus more than most.
Punk is overblown as a wrestler, he’s fine in the ring but has had nothing memorable in the ring for over a year, while Sheamus can actually deliver a well told story in the ring. On any given night I’d rather see Sheamus in the ring over Punk.
I would agree more, Stinger, except that they’re turning Sheamus into Cena, with a lot of the same comeback crap and whatnot, done in Cena fashion. If they let him loose, I’d like him more, but he is STALE to me, much like Cena has gotten stale. The only times I’ve enjoyed Cena this year is when he broke out of the goody-two-shoes crap and sounded authentic, and it works for a week, and then they drag him back in. The stuff they’ve had Sheamus do with the borderline racist skits and the nickname even is just TERRIBLE, and I can’t back him.
And yeah, I guess I’m somewhat biased, because I love Punk, and I thought he put on a great Summerslam bout and again at NOC. His association with Heyman is golden if he gets to use it right and not just typical heelish bullshit. He isn’t as technically sound as Bryan, BUT, he’s better than most the roster (I do hate that he can’t unleash a tight flying elbow to save his life, where’s HBK to teach this man how it’s done?), and he IS a good storyteller when given the freedom too.
In short, it just seems like Creative really has boxed them both in when these guys do best outside of a box.
I actually agree with you more than I disagree, Thad. I guess I’m okay with Sheamus becoming the new Cena becoming the new Hogan becoming the new whatever. I would totally rather Sheamus was booked as a tough guy who could lose, instead of being this super tough guy who can only ever lose if he gets knocked unconscious and even then he still might not lose.
Still, someone has to do the Cena role and I think Sheamus does it better than Cena, and if it lets Cena do something else (it won’t, but here’s to hoping) then great. Plus, that Extreme Rules match with DBry is the balls. Easily my favorite match from the WWE so far this year.
Sheamus is Sheamus. I’d rather he got better, but only the whole I’ve liked his face turn from last year and have been okay with him so far this year. He’s had some deep valleys, but his peaks are pretty high.
Punk is just a disappointment. I don’t know how we live in a world where Punk and Jericho feuded and I can’t remember anything good about it, or how Punk and Bryan had a feud and I can’t remember anything about it, or anything else. Punk is there and he’ll keep talking or whatever, but until he gets me excited about his in ring work I can’t be bothered. Until then he’ll just be this dirty insecure homeless guy with a gaudy belt.
Sheamus doesn’t wear jean shorts. So he’s already better than Cena.
I just don’t like him because he hates Gay people. He’s a backwards Homophobe who shouldn’t be allowed on TV.
Sheamus needs to have his character stripped down to “Oy’ll foight ‘im” and he can just perform gingery fustigations on people.
If Sheamus had a soul your comment would make it weep.
Okay, leave out gingery and he can just do regular fustigations upon folks.
No, no, soulless gingery fustigations are the best!
@Lobster: They tried that with Fit Finlay and it didn’t work. And Finlay >>>>>>>> Sheamus any day, at least in my book.
So, Brandon, when will you be appearing on War Rocket Ajax?
whenever and however many times they’d want me to
Sums it up rather nicely.
I just want to say that Brandon Stroud and Chris Sims hangin’ out and writing is my favorite crossover event this summer.
This is us sharing a Presidential handshake at Chikara’s King Of Trios tournament.
Great post. Absolutely how I feel about Sheamus. I too, enjoy his work in the ring (quite a bit, actually), and it was frustrating as it was to watch him get destroyed around these parts post-Wrestlemania, as things progressed it became impossible to defend him. It’s a damn shame, Celtic Warrior Sheamus who stepped up to Mark Henry was great, and WWE took all the potential there and just ruined it entirely.
Great article.
RumHam is right. Sheamus stepping up to Mark Henry last year was awesome. I want more of that, less Sheamus kicking Ricardo’s head.
I’m in the same boat. Sheamus does some pretty good work with the bigger guys. I’d like to see him versus The Ryback at some point.
Exactly. So maybe Punk and Sheamus are fine as characters, but they just aren’t being used right.
Yeah, I’ve got no problem with Sheamus’s in-ring skills. I think he’s an outstanding wrestler for his size.
Sheamus vs. Bryan at Extreme Rules in Chicago is still my favorite WWE match this year. Mostly because of the fact that they basically just let Bryan kick his ass for 20 minutes before Sheamus got the cheap Brogue Kick win but it was still great work from both guys.
It’s the race baiting and cliched Irish nonsense that I hate.
Part of the problem with Sheamus is his size and their refusal to change how they book him. When Sheamus was feuding with Mark Henry, it was great. Sheamus was standing up to the physical bully and they had some really good power house matches. When Sheamus is feuding with Daniel Bryan and Alberto Del Rio, they still book those two like they’re tougher than him and it just doesn’t work. For Sheamus’ antics to come off as retribution and not bullying, they need to book guys like that in a fashion where they are bullying him in other ways. Del Rio can’t just slam car hoods on Sheamus, he needs to do things like take away his finishing moves. They need to be manipulative and creative, in the same way that McMahon was to Austin. McMahon could never stand up to Austin physically, but he could manipulate things around him to be the bigger asshole. That’s what we need to see from Del Rio.
Good post, stranger.
I think the bigger problem of the WWE is Jerry Lawler and America. Jerry Lawler is the problem because he’s a female hating racist piece of shit who the majority of the WWE universerse listens to, as if it were gospel. Ever try and talk to a tool of a person about the WWE? Chances are you are hear Lawler’s opinions.As long as he is on the air spouting out racsit and sexist crap, people will listen and they will cheer whomever he wants them to cheer. Sadly, CM Punk hit the nail on the head when he called Lawler the propaganda machine.
As for America, well, the WWE for better or for worst does reflect some contemporary parts of American society. WWE’s definition of heels and faces are how America defines them at their point of society. Perhaps it’s because the economy sucks, people need jobs, etc, but I think that’s why we’re seeing narcissistic, dominant faces. People can live through these faces and dominate the perceived bad guys. Even if the actions of the “faces” are irrational, it doesn’t matter, because the faces have some sort of quality that fans can relate with.
More Chris Sims please!
The problem with Sheamus’ character right now is that he’s being presented as someone we should take seriously, while he doesn’t appear to take anything seriously. There are only a few things this WWE has done this year that I’ve hated more than his silly ass spilling tacos in Del Rio’s car and that damn deposition. There’s no shortage of guys on the roster now who serve no greater purpose than to get cheap, dumb face reactions – Santino, Brodus, Ryder, Kofi/Truth. There’s just no reason to take one of the baddest looking guys on your roster and make him act like a racist goofball to make people like him.
A little while ago I fell down a Youtube hole and watched a decent chunk of the ’98 Survivor Series, where the title was vacant and there was the 16-man tournament for the belt. I’m not pining for the PG-13 aspects of the Attitude Era, but what was positively striking looking back is how important they made the belt seem to every one of those guys. Hell, Austin vs. McMahon was about nothing so much as it was about Vince not wanting Austin to be the champion. Today? We get Cena telling Punk that having the title doesn’t matter because Punk’s not in the main event. It’s so backwards that it seems broken.
Oh man I completely forgot about that PPV. I’m watching it now as we speak, but honestly, I’m not sure I can recover from Real Man’s Man William Regal, oh man, forgot about that one. Amazing.
The Regal song alone was worth watching the whole thing. But from a storyline perspective that show was a clusterfuck and yet somehow incredibly well put together. Swerves on top of swerves and yet everything ended up making almost perfect sense.
Also, this article was awesome. I’ll read more Sims any day.
Awesome read, Mr. person I don’t know. You should totally do this for a living.
Wonderful column.
Awesome read, can we have another!
Is your name Kevin Dunn.