It was a mixed bag for Super Bowl ads this year. It usually is, but I wonder if we’re just expecting too much from advertising companies on that first weekend in February. Their job isn’t to entertain us, it’s to sell us crap. Some firms managed to do both in the time alloted, and at almost $6 million per minute, that’s worth acknowledging.
There were a couple standouts: obviously the VW ad, and we’ll get to the rest in a bit. Max Pagehasm, the kid in the Darth Vader suit in the Volkswagen ad, appeared on the Today show this morning. Max is closer to Vader than one would have originally expected; he was born with a congenital heart defect and had to be fitted with a pacemaker. That child is more machine now than man…twisted and evil.
As for the others, well, that’s what we’ll attempt to parse out here. For the second year in a row, I’ll be reviewing every ad from Super Bowl XLV. These were my ground rules for eligibility:
- Ads are rated for memorability, scale, and message economy. I’m not necessarily rating the ads by my own personal preference so much as by whether or not the company actually spent the money on the ad, and should have done so.
- Ads for Fox shows are ineligible (Sorry, Glee).
- Ads for films are not reviewed. Movie previews are supposed to be awesome, and all the time. If a quality 30-second synopsis can’t be made out of a 90-minute film, then it’s hardly the fault of the people creating the ad.
- Ads during halftime aren’t counted (Suck it, Chatter).
Brace yourselves for another clickfest. The pages are broken up by every grade or so (A through F), so you can do the math for the most part. Agree or disagree in the comments; you’ve already seen these multiple times by now, anyway. We’re embedding as many as we can (while they’re still up).


Bud Light dog sitting reminded me of the dog party at the end of “Go Dog Go” and that is why it was my favorite commercial of the night.
RoseAnn Barr getting nailed by a large log = A++
*note: probably the first time she’s been hit by a pole in a long time, really”
I thought the Ozzie/Bieber ad was effective and funny. Although, I can’t remember what company it was for, but that has more to do with whiskey than the ad itself.
i’ve never been so disappointed in a post from a blogger i generally like and agree with…punte fail – all but 3-4 commercials fucking blew
Todd, I’m sorry you’re disappointed in me, but you have to remember, I have horrible taste in everything. Plus I could hardly give all of them Fs.
I disagree with that Groupon one. I saw where the funny was supposed to be, but it didn’t do it for me. Not the best way to introduce yourself to the massive viewing audience.
We all chuckled at the “which one” Pepsi Max commercial. Kind of low-brow…but then I’m very low brow. Not enough potty limericks though.
in mexican tv we miss all that stuff and have to endure the silly lot of commercials and characters thrown at us, i don’t know if tvazteca had ines sainz around
You forgot the “Children are our future unless we stop them” tag, PUNTE.
Hmm…this is why you write for a sports blog. Though, keep up the good work on that front.
“Bud Light had only one miss for the night…”
Really? If you asked me, Bud, InBev, whoever the FUCK they are now totally missed by spending money on commercials instead of better ingredients in their beer other than rice. I realized they truly fucked up when I went to the fridge and found a Sam Adams’ Revolutionary Rye Ale. Sam Adams is available in about every grocery store and continues to put out new beers every year. While none are like amazingly incredible, they still are solid beers that even a Bud drinker could like. How many Sam Adams commercials did you see? None. I’m glad they spend their money on making new beers instead of making commercials.
Was the TGI Fridays comment “People go to Fridays to end their relationships, not start them” in reference to the guy who stabbed his wife to death outside of one in the Milwaukee area back in the 90′s only to later be beaten to death with Jeffrey Dahmer?
The Pepsi Max was poorly done since it sent mixed messages.
First off, it wrongly portrayed the interaction between the guy and the white chick. In real life, not only would the white chick not have smiled at the guy, she would have got up and left the area when she saw two criminals walking towards her.
The only real part was the black on white violence that occurred at the end of the clip (and the fact that all blacks try to solve their issues through violence), followed by the criminals running away from the felony they just committed. I can only imagine what Al Sharpton would have said if a white person nailed a negro in the head with a pop can.