It’s inevitable. As soon as Nebraska became the twelfth team in the Big Ten (thereby activating the opportunity for that league to host its own championship game), the rivalry that has in many ways defined that conference was in jeopardy. And while it’s easy to discount the national implications of Ohio State’s annual football tilt with Michigan, the local ramifications of moving the game off that third Saturday square will be drastic for both programs. But I’m getting ahead of myself.
The Big Ten will be splitting into two divisions. Early reports have Ohio State and Michigan in separate divisions. That’s fine, whatever. But the more crucial discussion revolves around moving the game up the calendar, to October. The logic here is that this would give each team a chance to rebound from a loss in the polls and the standings, thus keeping one or both of the league’s powers in its conference championship picture.
Whether you care about the Big Ten or not, the proposal here is rather baffling: the Big Ten wants to INTENTIONALLY downgrading its biggest regular-season game, presumably so that it doesn’t upstage their own conference championship. And really, that’s what they’ll have to do to make sure anyone gives a damn about that game, because there will never be a Big Ten game bigger than The Game.
It’s easy for someone whose team never won anything before the 1990s to bash tradition, but think about the value of that game RIGHT NOW to both schools. In many years, Michigan has spoiled Ohio State’s season and vice versa. The Game has been a campaign climax for both schools for over 100 years. It is literally a one-game season. Ask anyone in Columbus or Ann Arbor; they’d be content with a 1-11 season, as long as the one came against their perennial arch rival.
The Game loses all of that if you make it just another date in conference play. And while it’s not as stylish as a true conference championship, one would be hard-pressed to argue that it’s less important. But this is the Big Ten, who can’t be be expected to value what it already has when it can’t even count the number of teams in its own damn league.


This series has produced a whole TWO national champions in the past almost 5 decades…DON’T MESS WITH TRADITION!!!
RTFA
You accidentally added a word to one of your tags.
I’m confused. Doesn’t a loss in October count the same as a loss in November in the standings? I don’t think moving the game earlier will do anything to keep both in the conference championship picture
Why the hell would they play in separate divisions? I know they don’t know math in the Big Ten, but are they also retarded on geography?
As a newly-minted Big Ten fan, I wanted to weigh in on the original post. Ultimately, Ohio State and Michigan leaders need to decide what is more important to them, keeping their game as the last of the regular season, while being members of the same division, or moving it earlier, while being members of opposite divisions. From what I have read, it seems like the leaders of Michigan and Ohio State, are campaigning to be in separate divisions to give themselves the opportunity to play in the championship game. You have to admit that part of what had made “The Game” be so important is how often the conference championship has been on the line. So you have a choice, have it be a great rivalry where at the end of the season the division championship is on the line, or have it be a guaranteed crossover game, played early in the season, and hope for the opportunity to play a second time in the season with the conference championship on the line. The Nebraska-Oklahoma was once the equal of “The Game.” But when the Big 12 was organized the powers that be screwed it up, by not guaranteeing that it was played every year. Ironically, if the Big 12 hadn’t screwed up the OU-NU game, it would have been harder for NU to make the leap to the Big Ten. Personally, I don’t like the guaranteed crossover games, but that is part of the culture of the Big Ten, so I’m sure they will be included, so I will embrace them. Honestly, I believe that this issue will be decided with sensitivity to what the leaders of Michigan and Ohio State want.
Doesn’t Michigan actually have to win games to make it to a championship game?
This series has produced a whole TWO national champions in the past almost 5 decades…DON’T MESS WITH TRADITION!!!
————————
or you could have said 2 in the past 15 years, which is more historically significant
Punte literally doesn’t know the meaning of the word literally.